Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
CASE REPORT
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 26  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 104-105

Aortic stenosis: A routine diagnosis with a rare cause


Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Center, Quaem Hospital, Mashhad, Iran

Date of Web Publication8-Aug-2016

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Atooshe Rohani
Cardiovascular Research Center, Quaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashad
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2211-4122.187965

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

A 40-year-old male patient presented with dyspnea on exertion and palpitation from 2 months ago. Physical examination revealed normal vital sign and a systolic murmur grade 3/6 in aortic area. Echocardiography revealed unicuspid aortic valve with an eccentric orifice, calcification, and aortic valve area of 0.9 cm 2 . This case report highlights the usefulness of three-dimensional echocardiography for the determination of number of aortic valve cusps, presence of raphe and morphology of valve.

Keywords: Aortic stenosis, echocardiography, systolic murmur, unicuspid aortic valve


How to cite this article:
Fazlinejad A, Rohani A, Layeghian M, Kargar S, Arefifar MR. Aortic stenosis: A routine diagnosis with a rare cause. J Cardiovasc Echography 2016;26:104-5

How to cite this URL:
Fazlinejad A, Rohani A, Layeghian M, Kargar S, Arefifar MR. Aortic stenosis: A routine diagnosis with a rare cause. J Cardiovasc Echography [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 Aug 9];26:104-5. Available from: http://www.jcecho.org/text.asp?2016/26/3/104/187965


  Introduction Top


The incidence of unicuspid aortic valve (UAV) is 0.02% in adult population, and unlike the bicuspid aortic valve, there are no familial cases reported. [1],[2] Unicuspid valves are more prone to bulky calcification, early, presentation of symptoms, and faster progression. There are no diagnostic criteria of the guidelines for diagnosing UAV, and in a literature review, we find that one of four patients cannot be precisely diagnosed with two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (2DTEE), and the diagnosis is often confused with bicuspid valve.


  Case Report Top


A 40-year-old male patient presented with dyspnea on exertion and palpitation from 2 months ago. He complained of one episode of blurred vision more than 30 min which resolved spontaneously. He has no risk factor or positive family history of heart disease. Physical examination revealed normal vital sign and a systolic murmur grade 3/6 in aortic area. Electrocardiography showed left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and normal sinus rhythm. Chest X-ray revealed dilated ascending aorta. 2DTTE and 3DTEE en face view clearly revealed unicommissural UAV [Figure 1], resulting in a circle-shaped appearance, eccentric orifice, medially situated commissure, and calcified lateral part of the leaflet. Aortic valve area of 0.9 cm 2 , Doppler velocity index 0.2 [Figure 2], mild aortic regurgitation, and severe concentric LVH were observed. There was also dilatation of ascending aorta up to 53 mm [Video 1]. As in bicuspid aortic valves, aortic root dilatation of 45 mm or more in association of severe aortic stenosis should be thought of as an indication for replacement of the ascending aorta. [1] Our patient underwent successful Bentall operation with a 23 mm valve (St. Jude Medical, Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA). Surgical inspection confirmed the diagnosis of unicommissural UAV. The patient was discharged from the hospital in stable clinical condition and on medical follow-up. He remained asymptomatic for 2 years after surgery.
Figure 1: Three-dimensional echocardiography of aortic valve

Click here to view
Figure 2: Echo-Doppler images of transvalvular gradient

Click here to view




  Discussion Top


This case highlights the utility of 3DTEE for precise definition of morphology of UAV, presence of raphe, and position of commissure. In majority of the cases, commissure attach to the aorta posteriorly; however, in our case, commissural attachment situated medially. [3],[4] There are two subtypes of UAV: [2] Slit-shaped and pinhole. As we expect, our patient is a variant of slit-shaped UAV because pinhole UAV has early presentation in infancy. There is also some embryological difference between these two subtypes: In pinhole UAV, leaflet mesoderm grows in circumferentially from annulus, but in slit-shaped UAV, mesoderm grows in with two cooptation points. UAV associates with some other congenital anomaly of coronary artery, patent ductus arteriosus, and coarctation of aorta; however, this association is more prevalent in pinhole UAV. The symptom of this congenital anomaly is related to the type of anomaly: Pinhole anomaly is more likely to be presented by heart failure and failure to thrive during infancy whereas slit-shaped type presents earlier in comparison with other types of valvular aortic stenosis but symptoms are the same: Dyspnea on exertion, angina, syncope, calcium emboli, and monocular blindness. Treatment is always by surgery and replacement of aortic valve. This case report highlights two important features for clinicians in their daily practice: First of all, in case of blurred vision, they should search for cardiac source of embolization; second important feature is the usefulness of 3DTEE for determination of the number of cusps, presence or absence of commissures, and shape of the valve. In conclusion, unicuspid unicommissural aortic valve is a rare congenital disorder which presents in the third decade of life and almost always need corrective valve replacement.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3 rd , Guyton RA, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:e57-185.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Mookadam F, Thota VR, Lopez AM, Emani UR, Tajik AJ. Unicuspid aortic valve in children: A systematic review spanning four decades. J Heart Valve Dis 2010;19:678-83.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Sood N, Taub C. Unicuspid aortic valve: An interesting presentation. Eur Heart J 2008;29:1295.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Nakao T, Watanabe H, Takeda N, Takanashi S, Nagai R. The efficacy of real-time three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography in detecting unicuspid aortic valve. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;13:966.  Back to cited text no. 4
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Discussion
Case Report
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1289    
    Printed21    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded66    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]